|
Post by PaddyP on Jun 4, 2004 3:30:05 GMT 8
|
|
Ash
Rookie
Posts: 27
|
Post by Ash on Jun 4, 2004 3:35:12 GMT 8
Why is everyone getting that preogram all of a sudden *rolls eyes* Ok i might as well buy it haha Anyways they look good for first trys.
|
|
|
Post by PaddyP on Jun 4, 2004 3:36:08 GMT 8
It's a great programme, 3d is the new style.
|
|
Ash
Rookie
Posts: 27
|
Post by Ash on Jun 4, 2004 3:44:21 GMT 8
How much is the program through?!
|
|
|
Post by PaddyP on Jun 4, 2004 3:45:47 GMT 8
A lot I'd say, I just downloaded the demo.
|
|
Chris
Rookie
[untitled.fx2]
Posts: 50
|
Post by Chris on Jun 4, 2004 3:49:18 GMT 8
Im going to download the demo soon
|
|
|
Post by PaddyP on Jun 4, 2004 3:49:53 GMT 8
Cool, could you rate my images please.
|
|
Chris
Rookie
[untitled.fx2]
Posts: 50
|
Post by Chris on Jun 4, 2004 3:50:49 GMT 8
Oh yeah... 4/10 but for just starting: 6/10
|
|
Ash
Rookie
Posts: 27
|
Post by Ash on Jun 4, 2004 3:54:03 GMT 8
Just checked and is alot, demo for me
|
|
|
Post by PaddyP on Jun 4, 2004 3:54:05 GMT 8
Okay, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by PaddyP on Jun 4, 2004 4:01:49 GMT 8
oops, sorry, I posed a couple of the same ones, sorry, there were 4, I only posted 2.
|
|
|
Post by j!mmy.ang on Jun 4, 2004 4:15:58 GMT 8
nuts... just posted a long detailed comment and it was lost! nevermind.. a brief description/summary First three can be improved with the renders now looking a little pixelly or not too smooth. The one you edited in Photoshop was a mirrored image and I was like WTF? hehe! should put more effort there! Last two was good. Second last was nice with some good renders and potential. A little touch-ups and i think simplicity in the last one was the key.. i love the last two! Last two: The rest:
|
|
|
Post by PaddyP on Jun 4, 2004 5:58:25 GMT 8
;D
|
|
|
Post by PaddyP on Jun 5, 2004 1:51:31 GMT 8
Anyone else fancy rating them? You don't have to rate them all.
|
|